- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
My spoiler free review of Dunkirk
Posted on 7/15/17 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 7/15/17 at 11:09 pm
So...just got back from the screening at Pearl Harbor and have had a little time to gather my thoughts.
Wow. Christopher Nolan. What can I say? The man needs no introduction. All I can tell you is that he has crafted a film that just might be his undisputed masterpiece.
It is 1940 and more than 400,000 British, French, and Belgian soldiers are cut off on the beaches of Dunkirk, waiting for rescue or annihilation. Nolan uses a non-linear form of storytelling to advance the narrative along. While many here are probably used to Nolan's reliance on this technique, what he does here with Dunkirk is very unique.
Three different stories are being told at the same time. One on land, one on the sea, and one in the air. The events that take place on the land transpire over the course of a week, the events that take place on the sea transpire over the course of a day, and the events that take place in the air transpire over the course of an hour.
So that in one scene where we are with Harry Styles on the beach as night is falling, the very next scene will take place in broad daylight as Tom Hardy dog fights with German ME-109s several hundred feet above the English Channel....before returning to Harry Styles on the beach with darkness having completely fallen. And yet, despite the fact that these three narratives are all taking place at different times, they all come together at the end.
Needless to say....I see an Oscar nomination incoming for film editor Lee Smith.
As for the characters, you really never learn any of their names. There are no real character introductions, there are no backstories, there are no grand monologues about where Harry Styles or Cillian Murphy are coming from in their quest to survive and get home safely. Yet the acting is superb. As many of you have probably read, there is little dialogue in this movie. Most of the acting comes from these men's facial expressions as their characters deal with set-back after set-back.
Many people seemed disappointed when this film got a PG-13 rating instead of that highly wanted R, but there is a reason for that. This isn't a war movie per se. It's a survival film that just happens to take place in World War II. And Nolan really rams that home. There's no gore because he's not highlighting the horrors of war. He's simply telling a tale of men who want to get home.
I really loved this movie. I can't wait to see it again. I highly recommend it.
GRADE: A+
Wow. Christopher Nolan. What can I say? The man needs no introduction. All I can tell you is that he has crafted a film that just might be his undisputed masterpiece.
It is 1940 and more than 400,000 British, French, and Belgian soldiers are cut off on the beaches of Dunkirk, waiting for rescue or annihilation. Nolan uses a non-linear form of storytelling to advance the narrative along. While many here are probably used to Nolan's reliance on this technique, what he does here with Dunkirk is very unique.
Three different stories are being told at the same time. One on land, one on the sea, and one in the air. The events that take place on the land transpire over the course of a week, the events that take place on the sea transpire over the course of a day, and the events that take place in the air transpire over the course of an hour.
So that in one scene where we are with Harry Styles on the beach as night is falling, the very next scene will take place in broad daylight as Tom Hardy dog fights with German ME-109s several hundred feet above the English Channel....before returning to Harry Styles on the beach with darkness having completely fallen. And yet, despite the fact that these three narratives are all taking place at different times, they all come together at the end.
Needless to say....I see an Oscar nomination incoming for film editor Lee Smith.
As for the characters, you really never learn any of their names. There are no real character introductions, there are no backstories, there are no grand monologues about where Harry Styles or Cillian Murphy are coming from in their quest to survive and get home safely. Yet the acting is superb. As many of you have probably read, there is little dialogue in this movie. Most of the acting comes from these men's facial expressions as their characters deal with set-back after set-back.
Many people seemed disappointed when this film got a PG-13 rating instead of that highly wanted R, but there is a reason for that. This isn't a war movie per se. It's a survival film that just happens to take place in World War II. And Nolan really rams that home. There's no gore because he's not highlighting the horrors of war. He's simply telling a tale of men who want to get home.
I really loved this movie. I can't wait to see it again. I highly recommend it.
GRADE: A+
This post was edited on 7/16/17 at 4:39 am
Posted on 7/15/17 at 11:23 pm to RollTide1987
Subtle living in Hawaii brag, jk.
Going to see it on 70mm IMAX Friday

Going to see it on 70mm IMAX Friday

Posted on 7/15/17 at 11:46 pm to RollTide1987
Damn both of you
No early screening or 70mm IMAX around here
No early screening or 70mm IMAX around here

Posted on 7/16/17 at 10:25 pm to pjab
When I look at the listings it shows 70mm and then seperate showings for IMAX which one do I want?
Posted on 7/16/17 at 10:36 pm to Dizz
Regular 70mm will have better picture quality, regular IMAX (xenon) you will see more of the picture
I would probably choose IMAX
Here's all the formats it's in

I would probably choose IMAX
Here's all the formats it's in

This post was edited on 7/16/17 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 7/17/17 at 4:46 am to RollTide1987
Are spoiler warnings necessary for a movie about Dunkirk?
I'm really looking forward to this.
I'm really looking forward to this.
This post was edited on 7/17/17 at 4:47 am
Posted on 7/17/17 at 9:22 am to GetCocky11
One of the few movies I want to see this year. Dunkirk and the associated area holds special meaning for me.
My Great Uncle who died of stomach cancer about 1980 was one of the 30 survivors from his unit in/around Dunkirk, and he was shot in the head. I can still well remember him sitting in his recliner telling stories, mostly of hunting and fishing, didn't talk much about the war. He didn't complain about much as that man had seen real war and hardship and came out the other side.
My Great Uncle who died of stomach cancer about 1980 was one of the 30 survivors from his unit in/around Dunkirk, and he was shot in the head. I can still well remember him sitting in his recliner telling stories, mostly of hunting and fishing, didn't talk much about the war. He didn't complain about much as that man had seen real war and hardship and came out the other side.
Posted on 7/17/17 at 10:29 am to Sidicous
Question as I am ignorant to all of this resolution IMAX stuff..
The theater at the US Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, AL is showing this Thursday night in IMAX 70MM. However, they have an Omnimax or curved dome style theater. How does this work and should I try to experience it here or at another local digital IMAX theater.
I assume they just show a square projection on curved screen. Anyone with experience?
The theater at the US Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, AL is showing this Thursday night in IMAX 70MM. However, they have an Omnimax or curved dome style theater. How does this work and should I try to experience it here or at another local digital IMAX theater.
I assume they just show a square projection on curved screen. Anyone with experience?
Posted on 7/17/17 at 11:31 am to Bacciagaloop
quote:
I assume they just show a square projection on curved screen. Anyone with experience?
I mentioned this in a different thread, but I saw Harry Potter 5 at the McWane Center IMAX in Birmingham. It was awful. Completely stretched out and warped at the edges. Sound was kind of weird.
Someone commented that HP5 wasn't filmed for 70MM IMAX and was shown there as a gimmick. I don't know what this means for Dunkirk but unless someone can really describe the experience, I don't know if I'm up for spending the money on the IMAX experience.
Posted on 7/17/17 at 11:33 am to RollTide1987
Supposedly there are Harry Styles fans hanging out at some of the press screenings, asking the people as they leave the screening if Harry's character makes it through the movie alive.
Posted on 7/17/17 at 11:39 am to RollTide1987
Who had a better performance? Cillian Murphy of Harry Styles?
Posted on 7/17/17 at 1:13 pm to StringedInstruments
quote:
mentioned this in a different thread, but I saw Harry Potter 5 at the McWane Center IMAX in Birmingham. It was awful. Completely stretched out and warped at the edges. Sound was kind of weird.
Harry Potter wasn't filmed in IMAX is probably why
ETA: and I didn't read the second paragraph of your post

This post was edited on 7/17/17 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 7/17/17 at 1:44 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Who had a better performance? Cillian Murphy of Harry Styles?
I was very impressed with Harry Styles.
Popular
Back to top
