- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: N. Korea launches Ballistic missile in Japan's direction
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:15 pm to olddawg26
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:15 pm to olddawg26
quote:
Did you read the article? If yes, what did it say he talked about with him.
Oh I'm sure that stupid frick told the reporter or whoever everything they discussed. 
1
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:17 pm to AU_Right
So what did they discuss? Do you have another source?
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:17 pm to 225bred
quote:
Regardless of if this story is true or not, I think its becoming increasingly more clear.. We are not going to get any real help from China or Japan.
I get China, but what is Japan supposed to be doing here? They aren't friends with North Korea.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:18 pm to Retrograde
It is 4th of July there. Maybe this was a failed firework show? They tend to screw up a lot over there...
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:25 pm to 225bred
quote:
more clear
Eaux boy, ever heard of "clearer"?
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:26 pm to olddawg26
quote:
So what did they discuss? Do you have another source?
No, but if you believe it was just small talk, your an old fool. Obama can't help himself to interfere...especially when it comes to him trying to stay relevant. I guess he could've talked about his crowning achievement of getting a law passed as POTUS allowing men to use the women's bathrooms.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:27 pm to olddawg26
quote:rule of thumb if it's anything dealing with foreign policy that guy struck out on everything, so it's easier to assume fault from the beginning.
Blamed obama within the first page. Y'all are getting faster. Bravo
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:30 pm to AU_Right
How about we agree we have no idea what they discussed so a call to enact muh Logan is a bit dramatic and overreactive no?
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:34 pm to olddawg26
quote:
How about we agree we have no idea what they discussed so a call to enact muh Logan is a bit dramatic and overreactive no?
yeah...maybe you can get navy and displaced back...I tried to be nice and all.
This post was edited on 7/3/17 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:35 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
The Jappenese have a history of commiting some fricked up shite during wartime. North Korea doesn't not want to piss them off
This isn't the same Japan, they're basically impotent now, militarily speaking.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:39 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Not the first time
Not the last time either.
If you threaten to use the military.
Sooner or later you have to back up that threat, otherwise this is the result.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:39 pm to olddawg26
quote:
missile in Japan's direction
How about we agree we have no idea what they discussed so a call to enact muh Logan is a bit dramatic and overreactive no?
Do you think he reported everything he discussed to the current sitting president? If not, when do you reckon he will?
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:43 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I don't know. Can you prove he didn't? My answer is I don't know.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:44 pm to olddawg26
Should he?
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:46 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Japan would prefer a backwards shithole north korea remain.
A unified korea would be an economic powerhouse to rival japan
That being said, japan also doesnt want hiroshima again in 2017
A unified korea would be an economic powerhouse to rival japan
That being said, japan also doesnt want hiroshima again in 2017
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:49 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Of course. If anyone, including a previous president, undermines or slanders a current president to a foreign official, in a manner that is a negative impact to our country and relationship with the current president then they should be charged. A lot of this board has a history of making mountains out of mole hills and you know that. Everyone gets dramatic and has double standards when it comes to politics. My usual stance is somewhere in the middle, he probably said some of the cuff inappropriate remarks that would piss off certain people, but nothing to hurt the country, and nothing to hurt foreign relations.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:51 pm to olddawg26
You misunderstood my question. I was just asking if you thought he should report the entirety of his communication to the current president - whatever it was.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:51 pm to 225bred
quote:
We are not going to get any real help from China or Japan.
China, Japan, South Korea, and even Australia are the ones in the hit zone. Between DPRK's ineptitude and our own defensive capabilities, our country would not be at risk (just those stationed in the Pacific). WE won't lose a couple hundred thousand citizens and thousands of acres of habitable land in an attack.
They will have only themselves to blame for enabling the fat frick when he hits the button.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:52 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I think he should disclose anything that was said regarding politics between the USA and South Korea
Posted on 7/3/17 at 9:53 pm to olddawg26
So, if he doesn't it's a problem, right?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News