Started By
Message

re: Jimmy butler to Minnesota

Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:29 pm to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

they were really really really frickin young

They were, but there were younger teams, and younger teams who were better. Granted this is from early in season, but it should still hold pretty true. They were the 18th youngest going by the average age on the roster, but the 6th youngest distributed by minutes (below). And Portland, Utah, and Milwaukee were all playoff teams and younger.

Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48575 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:31 pm to
Their bench is awful and they don't have a 4 worth a damn plus guys like Rubio and Lavine arnt what TomT wants. I expected more but they were in a lot of games they lost and from the looks of it are getting a major face lift.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 9:33 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279489 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

And Portland, Utah, and Milwaukee were all playoff teams and younger.


Minny top 3 players(KAT, Levine, Wigg) all played most of the season at 21yrs old


Utah featured 26yrd old Hayward, Gobert(24), George Hill (30), Favors (25) and veterans like Diaw and Joe Johnson


Portland Lillard (26) CJ (25) Plumlee (26) Nurkic (22)


graph looks off but like you said was from earlier in the year

Milwaukee was young but im not about to compare them to an east team
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram