- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you support a convention of states?
Posted on 6/17/17 at 12:04 pm to Friscodog
Posted on 6/17/17 at 12:04 pm to Friscodog
Ok so let's bitch and moan and accuse one side of trying to change the constitution while we try to change the constitution?
Framers intent baw. If they intended term limits, it would have been in there.
Turn off levin and do your own thinking
Framers intent baw. If they intended term limits, it would have been in there.
Turn off levin and do your own thinking
5
Posted on 6/17/17 at 12:10 pm to airfernando
No.
Once convened, Republicans would do their customarily caving to Democrats. DC & Puerto Rico would end up as states, a PC equal rights disaster would be added to the Constitution, PC changes to the 1st Amendment and a total Liberal white wash of the 2nd Amendment.
No
Once convened, Republicans would do their customarily caving to Democrats. DC & Puerto Rico would end up as states, a PC equal rights disaster would be added to the Constitution, PC changes to the 1st Amendment and a total Liberal white wash of the 2nd Amendment.
No
Posted on 6/17/17 at 12:10 pm to Friscodog
Term limits.
Posted on 6/17/17 at 12:19 pm to Friscodog
The Constitution is fine the way it is. It just needs to be followed. Now if they're talking about repealing the 19th amendment, I could support that.
Posted on 6/17/17 at 12:23 pm to Friscodog
Absolutely... Balanced budget bill and term limits for all federal government officials
Posted on 6/17/17 at 12:27 pm to UHTiger
quote:
Framers intent baw. If they intended term limits, it would have been in there.
If any common citizen is against term limits with what is going on in our government today, then my God......
Posted on 6/17/17 at 1:03 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
Term limits.
We're likely to see Mork from Ork land on the White House lawn before we ever see constitutionally mandated term limitations.
Money is power, and Power makes money.
Posted on 6/17/17 at 1:10 pm to UHTiger
quote:Um.
Ok so let's bitch and moan and accuse one side of trying to change the constitution while we try to change the constitution?
We don't bitch about the left wanting to change the constitution.
We bitch about the left not even bothering with changing it as designed and simply reimagining it.
Posted on 6/17/17 at 1:15 pm to ShortyRob
We need an airline passengers bill of rights.
More legroom in coach.
More legroom in coach.
Posted on 6/17/17 at 1:17 pm to OchoDedos
Convention of states is the best way to get it done.
Posted on 6/17/17 at 1:17 pm to Eurocat
quote:
We need an airline passengers bill of rights.
More legroom in coach.
ISWYDT
Posted on 6/17/17 at 1:29 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Its odd that so many are scared of doing this legitimate constitutional process, but don't care a whit when the Supreme Court changes the Constitution illegitimately.
Truth bomb
Posted on 6/17/17 at 1:37 pm to Old Sarge
How is that a truth bomb?
Do you not understand why the situations are completely and utterly different? I asked that guy the same question but he never answered.
Do you not understand why the situations are completely and utterly different? I asked that guy the same question but he never answered.
Posted on 6/17/17 at 1:40 pm to Loserman
quote:
35 years ago I made an oath to support and defend the constitution, against all enemies foreign and domestic...
Therfore, Yes I would support an Article V convention.
50 yrs ago here, I am with you
Posted on 6/17/17 at 1:48 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
If the Supreme Court creating law that violates the constitution doesn't scare the shite out of you EVEN IF YOU ARE A LIBERAL AND THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS SUIT YOUR AGENDA.....something is wrong with your compass as an American
Posted on 6/17/17 at 2:00 pm to UHTiger
quote:
If they intended term limits, it would have been in there.
Then why was it amended 27 times?
Posted on 6/17/17 at 2:02 pm to Friscodog
I would, and I have.
Posted on 6/17/17 at 2:06 pm to Friscodog
"It is our goal to limit the federal government to its delegated, enumerated, Constitutional functions."
Constitution Party
Because the Dems & Pubs have created this modern day disaster. Drain the MF Deep State SWAMP! NOW!
Constitution Party
Because the Dems & Pubs have created this modern day disaster. Drain the MF Deep State SWAMP! NOW!
Posted on 6/17/17 at 2:21 pm to Old Sarge
That doesn't even make sense. And is irrelevant to our conversation
Do you not understand the difference between the nation's most senior jurists interpreting the law and a bunch of our elected representatives trying to create a new document or amend existing law?
If you don't think there is a fundamental difference then there is no reason to even have the discussion
Do you not understand the difference between the nation's most senior jurists interpreting the law and a bunch of our elected representatives trying to create a new document or amend existing law?
If you don't think there is a fundamental difference then there is no reason to even have the discussion
This post was edited on 6/17/17 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 6/17/17 at 2:24 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
You clearly lack a basic understanding of how the Supreme Court works
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News