Started By
Message

re: Robert E. Lee has been misrepresented by regressive "historians"

Posted on 5/22/17 at 9:05 am to
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
6469 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 9:05 am to
quote:

I think it's slightly dishonest on both sides. Lee most certainly supported slavery in the sense he used them to right his inherited plantation after it had fallen on hard times.


He honored the instructions of the Custis will. He was to emancipate the slaves once the plantation was in good financial position. That is exactly what he did.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 9:08 am to
quote:

I think it's slightly dishonest on both sides. Lee most certainly supported slavery in the sense he used them to right his inherited plantation after it had fallen on hard times.

He honored the instructions of the Custis will. He was to emancipate the slaves once the plantation was in good financial position. That is exactly what he did.


He kept people as slaves when he didn't have to.
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29270 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 10:49 am to
quote:

He was to emancipate the slaves once the plantation was in good financial position. That is exactly what he did.


$$$ > human rights

face it, lee was a hated slave owner who beat his slaves and treated them very badly. go study history!!1!!!!1
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram