Started By
Message

re: They killed him

Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:11 am to
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51811 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:11 am to
Killah, you're trying hard brah. I'll give you that much and props for standing your ground.


However, your gun just ain't got no bullets at this point. The evidence, however circumstantial is just too overwhelming for you guys to argue innuendo as a defense. There's a mountain of it.

They killed that boy to shut him up and for what he knew. The prosecution angle just doesn't hold water for ONE reason.

Is leaking information regarding election rigging a crime? WTH would they charge him with? Being honest?

Obvious reason #2, in ANY other circumstance the DNC would have been screaming from the mountain top about Seth being killed in an upscale neighborhood with a gun. If someone isn't safe there from the evils of firearms, where would they be safe. Instead, they run from the Rich story like it has AIDS.

Gun ain't got no bullets baw.
This post was edited on 5/20/17 at 8:17 am
Posted by GFaceKillah
Welcome to the Third World
Member since Nov 2005
5935 posts
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:15 am to
quote:

However, your gun just ain't got no bullets at this point. The evidence, however circumstantial is just too overwhelming for you guys to argue innuendo as a defense. There's a mountain of it.


What evidence? Assange hinting that he may be the leaker is the only thing you have.

quote:

Is leaking information regarding election rigging a crime? WTH would they charge him with? Being honest?


Stealing and disseminating information is a crime. He likely could have avoided prosecution as a whistleblower. That would be the angle I would go with if I was you.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram