- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/19/17 at 11:04 am to bamarep
quote:
Harvard study: 98% of MSM coverage of Trump negative
Part of the problem with political discourse today is people think that coverage of all sides and all candidates should be close to 50% positive and 50% negative. Trump's presidency has been one frick up after another. The fact that the coverage has been overwhelmingly negative reflects reality.
When news networks go out of their way to produce positive content about a candidate because they want to APPEAR unbiased, that IS bias.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 11:08 am to Eurocat
quote:
Maybe becausez 98% of what he does in negative.
And there's the big problem in this country today...too many kool-aid drinkers of the MSM who can't think or reason for themselves!
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:42 pm to Aubie Spr96
quote:
, but there's no rational person that truly believes that 98% of what Trump has done (which isn't much, frankly) is bad.
"Making libtards melt" and "draining the swamp" aren't real things. What has he done that is objectively good? He has failed on delivering ritually all of his promises (wall, ACA, HRC prosecutor, tear up Iran deal, nafta, Muslim ban, china is currency manipulator...)
Granted, it may not be 2% but it isn't more than 8-10. What are the successes?
This post was edited on 5/19/17 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:43 pm to Eurocat
Horse shite
The North Korean media isn't much worse, hahaha
The North Korean media isn't much worse, hahaha
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:44 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Maybe becausez 98% of what he does in negative.
Poor you.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 1:22 pm to Salmon
quote:
this just illustrates that the media doesn't have to spin things, Trump does this to himself
Hilarious. Trump is President. of course he is going to talk about his presidency, and in turn himself. of course, Obama only talked about Bush, so I guess you have a reasonable point here.
quote:
also with as much as this board bitches about the "muh Russians", it only receiving 6% of the news coverage is surprising
Because the liberals on this board continue to bring it up like it is fresh and exciting. of course, the media is not talking about it much anymore, because it has pretty much been debunked.
Now they are obsessed much more with memos and what he said to Russians.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 9:57 pm to DawgsLife
MSM colluded with the Clinton campaign. The facts are clear.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 10:30 pm to JayDeerTay84
You know the president is a disaster when Fox news, which is rubber stamp mouthpiece for the GOP, has more negative coverage of their own guy.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 10:33 pm to Eurocat
quote::rimshot:
Maybe becausez 98% of what he does in negative.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 10:45 pm to bamarep
Kind of a chicken/egg scenario isn't it? Dude's a frick up.
Posted on 5/20/17 at 12:06 am to bamarep
What has MSM covered that was positive for Trump? The firing of Comey? 
Posted on 5/20/17 at 12:11 am to bamarep
quote:
In America they analyzed CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal.
They also took into account the BBC, the UK’s Financial Times and the German public broadcaster ARD.
And water is wet.
I mean besides Fox...it's all Hill camp kool-aiders.
Uk is fricking gone to hell...and Germany?
Merkel no likey? Go figure. Her BFF got defeated in the US elections.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News