Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:32
Registered on:5/19/2017
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
This isn't important for a number of reasons. Use your brain, people.
quote:

Any evidence to support that ad-hominem?


Sure. The actual news and the response of this board. What's also funny is that to many it was "fake" until Fox reported it, despite the NYT and WaPost having a far more accurate track record.

#traitors #Trumpcucks
quote:

WaPoop is a high school gossip level site


Says the guy that dropped out of high school. #heehaw #sisterfricker
It was a pipe-dream that the Dems would win that election considering Trump carried it by 20 points. I don't know why people are so excited or surprised.

If anything, they should be concerned he only won it by 7 points.

:lol: :nana: :violin:
This is put into language the hee-haw crew here can relate to:

'Trump’s hands cucked by Emmanuel Macron’s massive alpha paws'


LINK :lol:
Physical labor jobs are often associated with republicans, such as farming and construction work. Makes a lot of sense.
quote:

i know right? how dare he tell those european ladies and gentlemen to start paying their agreed-to share for shared defense.


Except that's not even what this thread is about. Take your ADD meds and get back to me.
quote:

Why are Europeans so ugly? Americans are much better-looking than Euro's.


You're watching the wrong porn then.
What a sad, pathetic loser for a president we have. Just yesterday it came out he thought nuclear submarines were called that because they had nuclear weapons. This guy sure has a lot of the uneducated and ignorant fooled.
quote:

"Polls". Same polls that said Trump will never be our President.


For the most part the polls were accurate. They said Clinton would get more votes, which she did.

The bigger takeaway from all of this is Trump is destroying the future of the Republican party. We won't fully see to what extent until 2018 elections however.
The article implies the reduction amounts to about $60 million in Mexico. Hardly a drop in the bucket and it's certainly not paying for the wall. Not sure how reducing budget for counterterrorism is so smart either. :lol:

re: But...but...OBAMA! HILLARY!!!

Posted by micromac on 5/24/17 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

LINK


Bush did bring us into that mess. That is true.

I meant people as much as the officials themselves when I started this thread. Look at all the losers here posting things about Hillary Clinton. Get over it already. You are the real cucks.
quote:

What in the actual frick? Obama and the Dems bitched about Bush for 8 whole years?

Or were you just asleep and not paying attention cause you were being a good little sheep like they told you to be?


Yes, they did. But guess what, that was WHILE HE WAS PRESIDENT. Obama isn't president anymore, and Hillary never was! You're proving my exact point. Thank you! :cheers:
quote:

Well, previous administrations set precedents. It's normal to look back on how they did things.


That's certainly rational, but I don't understand why when something negative about Trump comes out, people start talking about random things about Hillary or Obama have (or have not) done that has nothing to do with the topic at hand as some form of excusing or defending the president.

If I get busted for robbing a bank, it's not much of a defense to tell the cops my neighbor is stealing Netflix.

re: But...but...OBAMA! HILLARY!!!

Posted by micromac on 5/24/17 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

An administration abused its power and should be behind bars. Letting that go just because they aren't in power any longer sets a bad precedent.


Are you referring to the Bush administration or the current one?

Proof/sources?

re: But...but...OBAMA! HILLARY!!!

Posted by micromac on 5/24/17 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Obama is still blaming Bush for his shitty presidency.



Where?

re: But...but...OBAMA! HILLARY!!!

Posted by micromac on 5/24/17 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

dems blamed W for a lot and i was one of them. On this board people who did that were whiny keyboard warriors. now that the shoe is on the other foot they are just whiny keyboard warriors.


I know they blamed W a lot. That's not in question. I don't remember them ever using W as a diversion tactic for criticism of Obama is my point.

But...but...OBAMA! HILLARY!!!

Posted by micromac on 5/24/17 at 2:15 pm
Why are people concerned with Obama and Hillary still? How and WHY is that an argument? I don't remember Dems ever whining about G.W. Bush and McCain after Obama was elected. Same goes for G.H.W. Bush when Bill Clinton was elected. Can someone explain? I'm genuinely curious.