Started By
Message

re: I'm amazed at the seeming apathy towards Marshon Lattimore

Posted on 5/1/17 at 6:26 pm to
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
18035 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 6:26 pm to
1) Lattimore is not even close to Patrick Peterson
2) Pass rush improves your secondary....secondary doesn't improve your pass rush
3) there is a long history of CB failures
4)we have not addressed the pass rusher opposite of Cam Jordan since Cam Jordan has been here
5) I'm pretty sure it is now a consensus that the two most important positions on the football field today is:
QB
Pass Rusher
Hence...the #1 overall pick in the draft
Hopefully Latimore will be the superstar he is projected to be.
I do understand that he is a player you couldn't pass up on....
It will be interesting to see who has a better career....latttimore or Barnett?
Posted by DCtiger1
Panama City Beach
Member since Jul 2009
8851 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Pass rush improves your secondary....secondary doesn't improve your pass rush


It absolutely can. Ever heard of a coverage sack? Jordan could have had several more sacks last year if the secondary was worth a damn. We already have 3 first rounders on our dline. We needed to improve the secondary.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31692 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

1) Lattimore is not even close to Patrick Peterson



Link? Stats to back this up? How can you be so sure?
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

2) Pass rush improves your secondary....secondary doesn't improve your pass rush


Absolute fricking bullshite. As another poster and I pointed out, half a second better coverage turns hits into sacks. We were 4th in hits.

I said this in 2014 and again last year, if you give the rush under 3 seconds to get home almost every play then you aren't going to get many sacks no matter who you have.

Coverage absofrickinglutely affects pass rush. They work hand in hand.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116592 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

1) Lattimore is not even close to Patrick Peterson


As s rated prospect. Yes. He is.

quote:

Pass rush improves your secondary....secondary doesn't improve your pass rush


False. In the modern NFL QBs get the ball out quicker than a pass rusher can get to him. We hit the QB a lot last year actually. We just couldn't cover anyone. It's called a coverage sack. Look it up.

quote:

3) there is a long history of CB failures


Irrelevant.

quote:

4)we have not addressed the pass rusher opposite of Cam Jordan since Cam Jordan has been here


Sure we have.

Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 8:21 pm to
Wrong. Lattimore is big like Pat Peterson, and effortlessly fast. Both could play offense or defense. They are both freakish athletes. Not all top rated corners have that athleticism across the board. They both have excellent size and arm length, as corners, combined with freaky athletcism. Elite gene pool specimins, both.

Also both are extremely skilled and excell in man coverage.

Do your homework before posting dope

Pat pete, 4.34, 38 inch vert, and 10'6 broad jump at 6'0 215, 32 inch arm length

Lattimore, 4.36, 38.5 inch vert, and 11 foot broad jump at 6'0 193, 31'1/4 inch arm length




This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 8:37 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram