- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UnitedHealth pulls out of ACA exchanges, profit soars 35%
Posted on 4/18/17 at 12:35 pm to Homesick Tiger
Posted on 4/18/17 at 12:35 pm to Homesick Tiger
You have to understand something. The term "success" has very different meaning to liberals and conservatives
In BamaATL's case, success means more people having coverage, period. It doesn't matter that everyone who already had coverage is now paying triple with higher deductibles and less coverage.
All that matters is that the number of "insured" went up....even though those insured can't afford their deductibles anyway.
People like him don't give a shite about the government stealing that money from you to pay for someone else. In fact, they encourage it.
In BamaATL's case, success means more people having coverage, period. It doesn't matter that everyone who already had coverage is now paying triple with higher deductibles and less coverage.
All that matters is that the number of "insured" went up....even though those insured can't afford their deductibles anyway.
People like him don't give a shite about the government stealing that money from you to pay for someone else. In fact, they encourage it.
This post was edited on 4/18/17 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 4/18/17 at 12:40 pm to dcrews
quote:Except they don't have coverage. They may have an insurance card. But if they have any event at all, they'll go bankrupt because they can't afford the deductible. Same as they would if they didn't have the "insurance".
In BamaATL's case, success means more people having coverage, period.
Posted on 4/18/17 at 1:00 pm to dcrews
quote:Unfortunately there may be a less than altruistic reason for his assertions.
All that matters is that the number of "insured" went up....even though those insured can't afford their deductibles anyway.
People like him don't give a shite about the government stealing that money from you to pay for someone else. In fact, they encourage it.
Healthcare systems like the one employing BamaAtl don't really give a rat's arse about the amount or affordability of your deductible. If d/t owed deductible you default, declare bankruptcy, lose your child's college fund, they don't care.
Why?
Because if your deductible is $10K, but your bill is $40K, the hospital still gets $30K. If your bill is $150K, the hospital gets $140K. Your loss is their major gain.
The concept of foisting unaffordable deductibles on the public is a real winner for those systems, not because of the deductibles, but because of the foisting (aka mandate).
BamaAtl works as an employed physician. No need to delve into the reasons for that. But as is obvious in these threads, he's wholly tit dependent. He views what's good for the system as good for him.
So in concert with his employer, he too couldn't care less about impact of a $12K deductible on a middle class family. Sad truth. Hell, he might even be gifted a little bonus if his hospital benefits enough.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)