Started By
Message

re: Why was Furniss' # retired before Walker?

Posted on 4/15/17 at 7:49 pm to
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19478 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 7:49 pm to
"Not half the player Walker was"? Stroll around the HOF room at The Box & take a good long look at Furniss' SEC & LSU hitting records. Four yrs vs three years or not, Furniss could swing the stick & all the records he holds are legit. There is a good reason his number has been retired. Furniss made a conscious decision to go to med school vs the pros. Either way, both are great players, so why knock one to prop up the other?
Posted by jlntiger
Member since Feb 2011
1447 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 9:17 pm to
Didn't knock anyone but you can't compare a 12 year big league career to never making it. It's a dumb debate. Both were great Tigers but if u can't see the difference u aren't looking. Furniss played first and hit in the most pro offensive time ever. Not bashing just being honest. U have ur opinion I have mine . Plus a year adds lot (60 plus games ) . He was never making the bigs .
This post was edited on 4/15/17 at 9:22 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram