Started By
Message

re: The Russians say the chemical attack was by the rebels, America says by Assad.

Posted on 4/5/17 at 10:30 am to
Posted by Pbhog
Pine bluff, Arkansas
Member since Oct 2015
3460 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 10:30 am to
There it is, a republican siding with a dictator rather than our biggest Allie in world, Britain.... why do republicans look up to dictators so much?
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76642 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 10:34 am to
Bc Putin is a real man
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 10:36 am to
quote:

a republican siding with a dictator rather than our biggest Allie in world, Britain.


No, I refuse to side with Saudi Arabia.

Oh and Im not a Republican FYI
This post was edited on 4/5/17 at 10:39 am
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 10:38 am to
quote:

There it is, a republican siding with a dictator rather than our biggest Allie in world, Britain.... why do republicans look up to dictators so much?


Why do we need to side with anyone on this? Here is an idea, we just watch from the sideline on this one.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48338 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 10:44 am to
quote:

There it is, a republican siding with a dictator rather than our biggest Allie in world, Britain


And you're siding with ISIS

Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
17361 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 10:50 am to
quote:

There it is, a republican siding with a dictator rather than our biggest Allie in world, Britain.... why do republicans look up to dictators so much?
Are you implying that we should always agree with our "biggest Allie"(sic) when considering sending our military into foreign conflicts?
quote:

To retreat now, I believe, would put at hazard all that we hold dearest, turn the UN back into a talking shop, stifle the first steps of progress in the Middle East; leave the Iraqi people to the mercy of events on which we would have relinquished all power to influence for the better. Tell our allies that at the very moment of action, at the very moment when they need our determination that Britain faltered. I will not be party to such a course. This is not the time to falter. This is the time for this house, not just this government or indeed this prime minister, but for this house to give a lead, to show that we will stand up for what we know to be right, to show that we will confront the tyrannies and dictatorships and terrorists who put our way of life at risk, to show at the moment of decision that we have the courage to do the right thing.

- PM Tony Blair, Speech to Parliament, 18 March 2003

quote:

That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics. Now let me be clear — I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him. But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaida. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.

- Barack Obama, 2 October 2002
With which of the above viewpoints did you agree back then? With which do you agree in retrospect?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram