- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would the WBC be more interesting if the United States played by state instead
Posted on 4/4/17 at 12:53 pm to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 4/4/17 at 12:53 pm to ReauxlTide222
Rizzo Sale Machado (though he didn't play for the US in the WBC) off the top of my head
California Texas and Florida would have the three deepest pools of talent to pull from in that order I think but I haven't looked at it
California Texas and Florida would have the three deepest pools of talent to pull from in that order I think but I haven't looked at it
Posted on 4/4/17 at 12:55 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Florida would have deGrom and Greinke as well
Posted on 4/4/17 at 12:58 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
You can use the U.K. for an example in international soccer
The U.K. Doesn't play as a country
England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have their own teams
The U.K. Doesn't play as a country
England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have their own teams
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)