Started By
Message

re: ULL Coach Robichaux discusses "Daddy Ball"

Posted on 3/29/17 at 12:05 pm to
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
21678 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 12:05 pm to
The only people directly involved with travel ball and "daddy ball" who will defend it are the coaches of those teams. You take people who occupy the same positions but beyond the travel ball age groups and they will all agree. It's detrimental to 95% of the athletes.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72421 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

The only people directly involved with travel ball and "daddy ball" who will defend it are the coaches of those teams. You take people who occupy the same positions but beyond the travel ball age groups and they will all agree. It's detrimental to 95% of the athletes.
This x INFINITY.

Plus, the travel ball associations that put these tournaments on are massive money scams.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22081 posts
Posted on 3/29/17 at 12:22 pm to
Playing any more than 5 tournaments in a year before the age of 13 is pretty much a waste of time and money (this assumes the kid is also playing local rec ball and it is a shame if he isn't). Ramp it up a little more the summer before freshman year. After freshman year, all bets are off.

But as far as sitting the bench, if the roster size is only 10-12 kids, most kids are going to play and play a lot. Most rec teams even have 10-11 kids and minimum play rules. It isn't until high school when some rosters have 18+ kids do you really see the frustrations of the kids on the bench.
This post was edited on 3/29/17 at 12:25 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram