- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: True or False: climate change
Posted on 3/14/17 at 11:10 am to Iosh
Posted on 3/14/17 at 11:10 am to Iosh
quote:Good grief. Do you not understand
These posts where you hint at the existence of a point rather than making them are also annoying.
quote:
concentration != forcing.
Or are you intentionally trying to mislead people by posting a "scary" graph?
1
Posted on 3/14/17 at 11:24 am to Taxing Authority
I understand it fine. I don't understand why it's relevant.
Do you think that if I posted a graph where the Y-axis was flat tons and not concentration that it would be linear?
Do you think a linear increase in the emission amount leads to an exponentially increasing concentration?
Do you think these graphs are difficult to find?
Do you think I'm not looking at one right now?
Do you think I'm not posting it because it's linear? Or do you think I'm not posting it because I'm making a point about how god damned obnoxious it is when one side provides arguments and data and the other merely cross-examines?
Is this particularly annoying when the cross-examiner makes irrelevant meta-observations speculating as to your motives?
Do you think that if I posted a graph where the Y-axis was flat tons and not concentration that it would be linear?
Do you think a linear increase in the emission amount leads to an exponentially increasing concentration?
Do you think these graphs are difficult to find?
Do you think I'm not looking at one right now?
Do you think I'm not posting it because it's linear? Or do you think I'm not posting it because I'm making a point about how god damned obnoxious it is when one side provides arguments and data and the other merely cross-examines?
Is this particularly annoying when the cross-examiner makes irrelevant meta-observations speculating as to your motives?
This post was edited on 3/14/17 at 11:28 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News