Started By
Message

re: Watched the OJ 30 for 30: Can anyone possibly believe he didn't do it after that

Posted on 2/23/17 at 9:37 am to
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16040 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 9:37 am to
What blew my mind was that the prosecution team didn't explain that of course a leather glove is going to shrink a lot once it has gotten wet. It's like they didn't even try to explain that or demonstrate that. Were they so lacking in common sense?
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16040 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 9:42 am to
Of course to this jury how could anything be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. They were like the Flat Earth Society. You couldn't prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Earth is not flat because from where they're standing it does appear to be flat and anything to disprove it is just fakery by the man
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140002 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 9:49 am to
quote:

leather glove


They also had OJ off his anti-inflammatories for a bit, so his hands swelled up.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
114097 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 10:29 am to
quote:

What blew my mind was that the prosecution team didn't explain that of course a leather glove is going to shrink a lot once it has gotten wet. It's like they didn't even try to explain that or demonstrate that. Were they so lacking in common sense?



Or the fact that for Furhman to plant the glove, he had to have known at the time for a concrete fact that OJ did not have an alibi. He wasn't in a woman's bed, at a bar, at a restaurant, on a plane, at a neighbor's house, that his daughter wasn't visiting him in his house, or making any financial transaction whatsoever. If Furhman didn't know that, then he's heavily risking himself getting felony charges and going to prison for a while.
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 10:34 am
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25525 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 10:52 am to
quote:

What blew my mind was that the prosecution team didn't explain that of course a leather glove is going to shrink a lot once it has gotten wet. It's like they didn't even try to explain that or demonstrate that. Were they so lacking in common sense?


They actually did in the rebuttal case. The problem is, of course, that once you have to explain why the glove you insisted OJ tried on didn't fit, you've already lost. The jury is thinking, if you knew it was going to shrink, why did you insist he put it on. It was a huge botch. They should have focused on the shoes. That's what destroyed OJ in the civil case along with his incredibly tone deaf deposition.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram