Started By
Message

re: Let's just get down to who the free agents can be

Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:38 am to
Posted by TechDawg2007
Bawville
Member since Nov 2007
32249 posts
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:38 am to
quote:

$181.7 M over 16 years equals just over $11M a year; at least try to do some work and put a legit argument out there if you are going to throw out the same old shite.
So, my question to you is: 1) Would you rather make $20 million/year and finish 7-9 year in and year out or 2) make $10 million a year and be a contender? All this while already having made $181.7M over 16 years
Posted by Throbinhood
Southern LA
Member since Sep 2013
819 posts
Posted on 2/9/17 at 10:50 am to
See, you're assuming that had he only been making $10 mil a year (which is criminal for a QB of his caliber) that the Saints front office would have spent the extra money wisely enough to make the team a contender.
Stop trying to say that Drew is selfish and makes to much. It's ignorant

Posted by Sauce Castieaux
Asheville, NC.
Member since Nov 2015
5038 posts
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:37 am to
quote:

So, my question to you is: 1) Would you rather make $20 million/year and finish 7-9 year in and year out or 2) make $10 million a year and be a contender? All this while already having made $181.7M over 16 years


This is such a tired arguement. What QB do you know worth a damn is making 10 million a year that is not on a rookie deal?

You dont want to pay for an elite QB than you better have an elite defense which we dont have

and just for a reference you have Joe Flacco making 22, Rodgers making 22, Wilson and Big ben making 21.

Its a horseshite argument that you cant have a QB making 20 million and win. Draft better and stop cutting guys a year after signing them to major deals. Thats our issue

Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:54 am to
quote:

So, my question to you is: 1) Would you rather make $20 million/year and finish 7-9 year in and year out or 2) make $10 million a year and be a contender? All this while already having made $181.7M over 16 years


I'd rather make $20 million/year as my paycut doesn't make the team draft better. It doesn't make FA signings better, etc.

This is a false dilemma that keeps being repeated on here.

The saints spent more money on defense this year than the Patriots by a long shot when you take in dead money.

Manning had a larger cap hit with the broncos from 2012-2015, yet they were able to surround him with weapons and build one of the best defenses ever.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16583 posts
Posted on 2/9/17 at 12:11 pm to
If I were in Drew's shoes and I was making $20M a year and the team was still struggling I would consider restructuring and taking less. HOWEVER, when I see $12+M in dead money in 2015, $40M in dead money in 2016, and $9M in dead money n 2017 (before the cuts even start); I know my contract is not the problem and I will be inclined to continue to be paid a reasonable salary while the team fixes their own shite. I would be willing to bend so much.

But, with that said this entire discussion is pointless when you actually look at the big picture. Drew's cap hit in 2016 was $17.25M (which ranked 15th amongst QBs) and his cap hit in 2017 is set to be $19m (currently ranked 14th). So he has obviously already taken a cut and is now paid as an average QB in the league. His contract is not the issue
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64572 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

So, my question to you is: 1) Would you rather make $20 million/year and finish 7-9 year in and year out or 2) make $10 million a year and be a contender? All this while already having made $181.7M over 16 years


1) All day, every day.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30166 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

So, my question to you is: 1) Would you rather make $20 million/year and finish 7-9 year in and year out or 2) make $10 million a year and be a contender? All this while already having made $181.7M over 16 years


The team starts with 150mil to spend but because of poor management decisions can only spend 110mil. Yeah I'm not taking a substantial pay cut.
This post was edited on 2/10/17 at 12:30 pm
Posted by BRL79
Member since Mar 2014
2980 posts
Posted on 2/11/17 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

So, my question to you is: 1) Would you rather make $20 million/year and finish 7-9 year in and year out or 2) make $10 million a year and be a contender? All this while already having made $181.7M over 16 years

Or take an undeserved paycut and still go 7-9. Brady keeps winning and has a large salary for years now but that doesn't stop them from winning.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram