- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Has govt ever defied a president like this?
Posted on 2/4/17 at 12:29 am to KaiserSoze99
Posted on 2/4/17 at 12:29 am to KaiserSoze99
2
Posted on 2/4/17 at 1:12 am to mahdragonz
I read the injunction.
The Court's "findings" were NOTHING. The Court stated NO FACTS to support its injunction. All the Court did was state that the burden was met.
That is the biggest pile of shite I have ever seen from a United States District Court. Jesus Cow Herding Christ!!!
There are NO FACTUAL DETAILS as to why the Plaintiffs proved CLEARLY that:
1) that there is a likelihood of irreparable harm with no adequate remedy at law;
2) that the balance of harm favors the movant;
3) that there is a likelihood of success on the merits of the case; and
4) that the public interest favors the granting of the injunction.
THEY HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF ANY OF THOSE ELEMENTS! It is entirely the opposite.
This injunction is PURELY political and SHOULD be immediately reversed. Goddammit, I am getting so fricking tired of the blatant usurpation of power and lack of respect for law or office.
We need a fricking WAR.
The Court's "findings" were NOTHING. The Court stated NO FACTS to support its injunction. All the Court did was state that the burden was met.
That is the biggest pile of shite I have ever seen from a United States District Court. Jesus Cow Herding Christ!!!
There are NO FACTUAL DETAILS as to why the Plaintiffs proved CLEARLY that:
1) that there is a likelihood of irreparable harm with no adequate remedy at law;
2) that the balance of harm favors the movant;
3) that there is a likelihood of success on the merits of the case; and
4) that the public interest favors the granting of the injunction.
THEY HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF ANY OF THOSE ELEMENTS! It is entirely the opposite.
This injunction is PURELY political and SHOULD be immediately reversed. Goddammit, I am getting so fricking tired of the blatant usurpation of power and lack of respect for law or office.
We need a fricking WAR.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 5:14 am to mahdragonz
quote:
Here is the document
Pure babble -
SO - they say they are "protecting the residents of this country
-- because of the irreparable harm
---- to the universities and institutions of higher learning.
---- and to the states tax base" - etc ad nauseam
Please explain that bullshite to the untrained ear.
What the heck is 'irreparable' about a temporary delay while vetting is being performed - when it only takes from a few hours or a day or so to vet someone who really belongs here. And if they don't belong here, then their asses should NEVER be allowed to come in.
Where is the irreparable harm?
and please don't snicker when you try to describe the harm to the universities and the tax base.
This is pure bullshite of the chili-shite variety.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News