- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Has govt ever defied a president like this?
Posted on 2/4/17 at 12:21 am to Iosh
Posted on 2/4/17 at 12:21 am to Iosh
quote:
never in history
States have standing to bring suit regarding an action the would create a positive burden on TEXAS as well as a number of other states. That positive burden being a huge influx of illegals TEXAS has to pay for.
In the current matter, letting in potential terrorists without vetting UNQUESTIONABLY outweighs the passive, potential burden on Washington or Minnesota.
The injunction today is WHOLLY unjustified. If ANYTHING, the Court should have enjoined issuance of visas until a hearing could be held. The irreparable harm for which the would be ZERO adequate remedy at law falls squarely on us in the form of exposure to violence and death.
I would REALLY love to see the evidence WA and MN presented to this Seattle judge. I can't imagine it involved the potential for serious bodily injury or death to many American citizens.
3
Posted on 2/4/17 at 12:29 am to KaiserSoze99
Posted on 2/4/17 at 7:17 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:Dude there are doctors in my hospital who can't get back into the US to see and treat their patients because they went to visit family in their home countries. This shite is happening all over the country. It's why Washington State filed a lawsuit vs the government and won--the EO unconstitutionally blocks people with jobs from reentering the country. This creates an actual burden on the state because businesses rely on people who are affected by the EO.
In the current matter, letting in potential terrorists without vetting UNQUESTIONABLY outweighs the passive, potential burden on Washington or Minnesota.
The Texas decision set a legal precedent that's going to be used against Trump's order
This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 7:19 am
Posted on 2/4/17 at 9:12 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
In the current matter, letting in potential terrorists without vetting UNQUESTIONABLY outweighs the passive, potential burden on Washington or Minnesota.
This is unquestionably a misunderstanding of the facts as they are.
We might even call them 'alternative facts'.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News