- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NYT: Trump was graceless and disturbingly ahistorical
Posted on 1/20/17 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 1/20/17 at 8:22 pm
15
Posted on 1/20/17 at 8:23 pm to joshnorris14
Fake news
Posted on 1/20/17 at 8:23 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Editorial board
Not the NYT
Posted on 1/20/17 at 8:24 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 1/20/17 at 8:26 pm to joshnorris14
NYT has a 10 year understanding of history if they say, ahistoric.
Is that now code for "non-Obama."
In his Farewell Address, President George Washington had advocated non-involvement in European wars and politics.
Is that now code for "non-Obama."
In his Farewell Address, President George Washington had advocated non-involvement in European wars and politics.
Posted on 1/20/17 at 8:29 pm to joshnorris14
Lol
Posted on 1/20/17 at 8:30 pm to joshnorris14
Would you link that? I can't find it anywhere.
Posted on 1/20/17 at 8:42 pm to joshnorris14
Moar Fake News from the New York Times.
Posted on 1/20/17 at 9:09 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
NYT
They're still around?
Posted on 1/20/17 at 9:10 pm to joshnorris14
Failing NYT is Fake News.
This post was edited on 1/20/17 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 1/20/17 at 9:33 pm to joshnorris14
How was he graceless? 
I thought he was business minded and professional looking...
I thought he was business minded and professional looking... Posted on 1/20/17 at 9:37 pm to joshnorris14
As if grace is even close to the most important quality in a president...
"Winning" is all that matters. Whether it be trade deals, bringing back jobs, or being fiscally responsible in covering Americans health care that can't cover themselves.
Ask the patriots if they want grace or Belichik
The MSM has some people convinced being eloquent and political correct in describing shortcomings is better for them than a man somewhat arrogant in his success. Because there isn't a clearly defined win/loss column annually like in sports people think liking their leader on a personal level is all that matters.
If not saying "mean things" or being overly PC was all that mattered Les have would run a more succesful program than Saban. Give me a man that gets the job done, the rest is just lagniappe
"Winning" is all that matters. Whether it be trade deals, bringing back jobs, or being fiscally responsible in covering Americans health care that can't cover themselves.
Ask the patriots if they want grace or Belichik
The MSM has some people convinced being eloquent and political correct in describing shortcomings is better for them than a man somewhat arrogant in his success. Because there isn't a clearly defined win/loss column annually like in sports people think liking their leader on a personal level is all that matters.
If not saying "mean things" or being overly PC was all that mattered Les have would run a more succesful program than Saban. Give me a man that gets the job done, the rest is just lagniappe
This post was edited on 1/20/17 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 1/20/17 at 10:23 pm to joshnorris14
I had meetings all afternoon so I can't comment on his "grace," which is a weird concept in this circumstances.
And while I'm not interested in inaugurations, isn't the inauguration itself historical, given its infrequency and what it entails, especially when it's not a reelection?
Besides, since we can't accurately determine what some random inauguration was like for most of our history, how can we ceremony it's any more or less historical than those?
I often defend the NYT, but this is just unnecessary and plain stupid.
And while I'm not interested in inaugurations, isn't the inauguration itself historical, given its infrequency and what it entails, especially when it's not a reelection?
Besides, since we can't accurately determine what some random inauguration was like for most of our history, how can we ceremony it's any more or less historical than those?
I often defend the NYT, but this is just unnecessary and plain stupid.
Posted on 1/20/17 at 10:30 pm to joshnorris14
They are not wrong.
Posted on 1/20/17 at 10:33 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 1/20/17 at 10:40 pm to joshnorris14
Check on the NY Times in 4 years
See how things are going
See how things are going
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News