Started By
Message

re: No more Mike the Tiger in Tiger Stadium? WTF?

Posted on 1/20/17 at 9:48 am to
Posted by AaronDeTiger
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2014
1558 posts
Posted on 1/20/17 at 9:48 am to
My point is we could go out right now and get a healthy 4 month old tiger that would live 20-26 years in our top of the line facilities that we are renovating with upgrades that are not required for accreditation, tomorrow. And not play the SJW game. But some people like to contribute to the pussification of America because they don't have the balls to say that "we think it's OK to have a live tiger in a cage and we are going to take the best care of him that we can and we don't give a **** if you like it."
This post was edited on 1/20/17 at 9:51 am
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 1/20/17 at 9:51 am to
quote:

My point is we could go out right now and get a healthy 4 month old tiger that would live in our top of the line facilities


Sure, if we paid for one.

That's kind of the entire point though. Zoos and sanctuaries have standards on transferring tigers.

quote:

And not play the SJW game. But some people like to contribute to the pussification of America because they don't have the balls to say that "we think it's OK to have a live tiger in a cage and we are going to take the best care of him that we can and we don't give a **** if you like it."


What a hero!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Still waiting for a logical argument against Dr. Baker's or for you to offer solid reasoning against accreditation.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram