Started By
Message

re: Gangs of New York has not aged well.

Posted on 1/7/17 at 4:02 pm to
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
37663 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Gangs of New York has not aged well.


This is incorrect.





It's always been a fairly mediocre film, and a bad film just in terms of Scorcese. The only good thing about it is DDL. That's it.
Posted by JombieZombie
Member since Nov 2009
7687 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 8:45 pm to
Yep. It's low-tier Scorsese.
Posted by Treacherous Cretin
Columbus, OH
Member since Jan 2016
1503 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:36 am to
quote:

The only good thing about it is DDL. That's it.


Sure, if you're a fan of over acting.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54969 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:17 am to
quote:

It's always been a fairly mediocre film, and a bad film just in terms of Scorcese. The only good thing about it is DDL. That's it.



This.

Its always been so-so, but DDL is so phenomenal that he elevates the film ten fold.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 12:47 pm to
I remember that it got a lot of criticism when it came out.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram