- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: sales tax on labor, yay or nay?
Posted on 1/4/17 at 11:33 pm to Napoleon
Posted on 1/4/17 at 11:33 pm to Napoleon
In my mind, if the labor is the end product that you're selling, then that should be taxable by a sales tax. In your particular line of work, your labor is your main product (though you do sell parts, which are definitely taxable), but the labor should also be taxable because your labor is the main part of your business. However, if you're building a product like a house or a car in a factory, then that labor should not be taxable under a sales tax because the labor itself is simply an input into producing the good that is taxable under a sales tax.
Of course, my thoughts mean nothing put up against the law, and the state of Louisiana may disagree (it does love to tax EVERYTHING), but my personal thoughts on what's subject to a sales tax simply comes down to "that which is sold to an end consumer on the open market is subject to a sales tax". The labor of the supply chain should not be subject to sales taxes, only the final product/service.
Of course, my thoughts mean nothing put up against the law, and the state of Louisiana may disagree (it does love to tax EVERYTHING), but my personal thoughts on what's subject to a sales tax simply comes down to "that which is sold to an end consumer on the open market is subject to a sales tax". The labor of the supply chain should not be subject to sales taxes, only the final product/service.
This post was edited on 1/4/17 at 11:50 pm
Posted on 1/5/17 at 8:16 am to TigerstuckinMS
what this boils down to is the sales tax code is way too complex, and IMHO it puts the burden of determining what is considered a movable/immovable onto the wrong person. The person collecting the tax should not be responsible for determing what is what, The end user should. That way if the state determines something was done wrong only 1 party is involved. Im not sure how it works, but It seems like it would be a huge ordeal if either the state or the end user would determine that they were incorrectly charged tax. From my perspective, I will lean to charging tax if the situation is questionable, because You can refund the customer the tax, and then ask the state for the refund. Good luck getting a customer to pay tax 10 months down the line if the state audits and determines something should have taxed. You will be on the hook.
Its bullshite.
Its bullshite.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News