Started By
Message

re: Dakota Access Pipeline Controversy

Posted on 12/6/16 at 1:47 pm to
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Pipeline companies are not drilling companies. One is a producer, and one is a transporter. The latter negotiate drilling rights; the former negotiate right of way.


Dude. I seriously DGAF about the industry. it is completely irrelevant to my point. we could be talking about the sewing industry and what I said stands. Private property rights are private property rights. ROW, drilling rights, access rights, mineral rights, any other kind of use of another person's property should require an uncoerced contractual agreement between two consenting parties.

quote:

It matters because ignorance of how these things work means that people who have nothing to do with an issue at hand get painted with a broad brush as being complicit. Eminent domain issues are controversial enough without mixing in incomplete information.



It literally doesn't matter at all.

edit: but thanks for the info in all seriousness.
This post was edited on 12/6/16 at 1:49 pm
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
20158 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 1:52 pm to

Until you needed a highway to drive your dying child to the hospital. (In the case of Eminent Domain).

Or until you are beat up in a mob just because you were covering a protest (in the case of it not mattering to differentiate).

Well, crap. Now I see your edit, and I have to retract my insult. Make up our minds. Are we mad at each other or not?

This post was edited on 12/6/16 at 1:53 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram