Started By
Message

re: Should have at least made Texas PAY more for Herman

Posted on 11/27/16 at 12:04 pm to
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61496 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Can you explain how LSU would have benefited by that?


By fricking over Texas? And considering they could offer Aranda you would make giving Aranda big money less likely.


Also, what if he flops? Would force Texas to pay for another buyout AGAIN.
This post was edited on 11/27/16 at 12:06 pm
Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
4623 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

By fricking over Texas? And considering they could offer Aranda you would make giving Aranda big money less likely. Also, what if he flops? Would force Texas to pay for another buyout AGAIN.


None of this benefits LSU. None of it. Your hypothesis that Texas would have less money to pay Aranda is flawed. Texas ain't running out of money. Ever. If somebody doesn't come work for them it won't be because they couldn't pony up enough money.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram