Started By
Message

re: if Kurt Cobain wouldn't have suicided?

Posted on 11/27/16 at 12:31 am to
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67309 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 12:31 am to
Vetter and Cornell were around but virtually unknown outside of Seattle prior to Temple of the Dog. That's what gave them the notioriety for their bands to blow up and become national.

Nirvana was already around and becoming popular. However, without those other "grunge" bands, Nirvana is essentially a band without a genre. They're an indie act instead of the bannermen of the new genre of "grunge". Nirvana just ends up being some random Seattle band that made a few catchy songs. They get nowhere near as big. What drove their popularity was that MTV declared grunge the new thing and pimped it over metal, mostly with Pearl Jam, Soundgarden, STP, and Nirvana. Without those first 2 bands, there's not enough bands to promote to declare a new genre. Nirvana is just another late 80's indie punk band.

What would really be interesting is to see what would have happened to other "grunge" acts like Alice in Chains. Would they have been billed as metal? Would they have had the same success? What happens to the 80's metal acts that seemingly disappeared in 1991? Do they still remain in the public consciousness? Does MTv still abandon them?
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167922 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 8:59 am to
Kingbob, I'm glad you're not a music historian because both of your post are way off and read of a teenager reciting Wikipedia.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59678 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:54 am to
quote:

kingbob



You are so far off the mark.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram