Started By
Message

re: A question for all-do you think LSU can do better than Orgeron?

Posted on 10/28/16 at 4:38 pm to
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28505 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 4:38 pm to
Absolutely. And hell, maybe O turns out to be a home run hire.

But the fact is that we should be able to find someone with a better track record. LSU does not have to make a risky hire, which is precisely what O is.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70984 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 4:41 pm to
It'd be a very risky hire. And a cheap hire. All of a sudden LSU (a top 10 job in football) pays their HC in the bottom tier of the SEC? Dan Mullen would likely make more.

If that's not settling, I don't know what is.
Posted by LSU40
Vicksburge, MS
Member since Oct 2007
2253 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

Absolutely. And hell, maybe O turns out to be a home run hire. But the fact is that we should be able to find someone with a better track record. LSU does not have to make a risky hire, which is precisely what O is.


I get what you are saying, O would be a risk. Thing is Herman would be a risk, heck Jimbo would be safer but no guarantee. A new head coach would want to bring his own coaching staff and that can be very risky.
Heck Charlie Strong was supposed to be a home run hire for Texas, as Kelly was also at Notre Dame. No matter who LSU hires there will be a risk envolved . Thing to also think about is how much money and for what length will the contract be for?
I still think Herman or Fisher would be great hires, I'm not totally sold on coach O yet, but if he runs the table and could communicate a good plan going forward he would be considered at the very least.
Man this is going to be big for LSU, I hope they get it right.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram