Started By
Message

re: Drop Eddie Lacy- placed on IR

Posted on 10/20/16 at 12:45 pm to
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72113 posts
Posted on 10/20/16 at 12:45 pm to
There is a small part of me.. maybe 10%.. that thinks Davis could be good. He's had moments but generally been terrible. He's more of an athlete than a RB w vision or patience

GB hasn't had a RB like Jackson recently - he's smaller and quicker than the Lacy and Starks. And that alone intrigues me bc maybe they need that change of pace
Posted by PurpleDrank18
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2011
4508 posts
Posted on 10/20/16 at 12:55 pm to
Don't you think it says something about Jackson though, that he was only called up when the team was basically forced to do so. Last week for instance, instead of add him to the 53, they went into the game with one "healthy" RB, and probably felt if something happened to LAcy, they'd rather use TyMo than Jackson? I think Davis has a better shot of being fantasy relevant these next few weeks. I think the better add (if you have the bench space or IR spots) is Starks. He'll be back in a few weeks and i suspect when he returns it's basically his job. You'll have a decent starting RB for the end of the season plus fantasy playoffs.
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
21018 posts
Posted on 10/20/16 at 12:55 pm to
the guy I'm playing has Montgomery and also added Jackson.

who would you rather face tonight?
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158848 posts
Posted on 10/20/16 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

He's more of an athlete than a RB w vision or patience


hey I wrote c mike off because I believed this, its rare for the Packers to go out and trade for a guy so maybe they like something there
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram