Started By
Message

re: Jimbo contract does not contain the lsu clause in his contract. it was removed

Posted on 9/29/16 at 10:27 am to
Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
4623 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 10:27 am to
quote:

No you dont or you would post it.


You are either naive or ignorant (or both). Just because the 'proof' is not shared with you does not mean it doesn't exist. When information is conveyed in confidence, and accepted in confidence, the party accepting the information has a moral duty to keep it in confidence. To divulge the source of the information would not only destroy any future information from that source, but would also jeopardize that source's position with the people he (or she) is getting the information from. Just because you don't like the information or don't appreciate the confidentiality of the source does not make it wrong or imaginary. If you choose not to believe it, so be it. That's your choice.
This post was edited on 9/29/16 at 10:29 am
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46652 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 10:30 am to
quote:

You are either naive or ignorant (or both). Just because the 'proof' is not shared with you does not mean it doesn't exist


You said you had proof. You dont. It's only proof if it PROVES SOMETHING.
You saying you have proof IS NOT THE PROOF.
Also, why on God's earth would i not like the info of replacing Miles with IMO a proven upgrade?


Also, i have insider info that Belichik begged for the lsu job and Alleva said no. I have proof.
What proof do i have? My proof is me saying i have proof.
This post was edited on 9/29/16 at 10:31 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram