Started By
Message

re: Recruiting Class Myth

Posted on 9/7/16 at 7:52 am to
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35509 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 7:52 am to
You are also not maximizing your recruiting classes if you pair 4 and 5 star receivers with a QB who can't throw accurately. That also minimizes the value of your blue chip running backs and o-line.

Sounds while you might have a 3rd ranked class, you really have to rank it around 10-15 because you are neutralizing some of your value.
This post was edited on 9/7/16 at 7:54 am
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
13335 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 8:42 am to
quote:

You are also not maximizing your recruiting classes if you pair 4 and 5 star receivers with a QB who can't throw accurately. That also minimizes the value of your blue chip running backs and o-line.

Sounds while you might have a 3rd ranked class, you really have to rank it around 10-15 because you are neutralizing some of your value.
And it usually means that level of recruiting is not sustainable. No coach can sustain consistent top-5's without the production on the field.

Credit Les (and an excellent recruiting staff, past and present) for improving recruiting as production / key wins dropped off. However, if there's a lag it's about to get ugly assuming the press of now, end of last year, and that catches up with us.

And agreed with many here: the recruiting of OL and DL suffered for quite a while. It's improved, but it seems not enough to make up for some deficiencies on the staff.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram