Started By
Message

re: Teddy Bridgewater possibly injured

Posted on 8/30/16 at 2:45 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279352 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 2:45 pm to
Hey i never said drastic. Shaun hill is a marginal player. I'm more booking on a change of game flow. I love AP but at his age & mileage I'm not sure he is equipped to out run a bad passing game. And their D isn't good enough to just lean on. They are going to have to throw the ball in order to be competitive
Posted by PurpleDrank18
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2011
4508 posts
Posted on 8/30/16 at 3:01 pm to
I think this is where our disconnect is coming from. From context clues I've gathered that I'm higher on MIN defense. I think you could argue they're a top 4 D in the NFC, and possibly top-8 in the entire league. I also like McKinnon a lot as a real life player. I think he'd be able to spell AP just fine to keep AP fresh, or if he were to start to breakdown due to age and mileage.

I would also argue that more volume, doesn't necessarily mean better or more efficient. Even if they do pass more, how many of those targets are going to be quality, compared to if Bridgewater was passing? Just a thought.

Not saying you're wrong. I think we just have different views of Minnesota as a team, and it's affecting our view on the offense and subsequently Diggs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram