- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Maybe discussed already but who has the bigger advantage?
Posted on 8/22/16 at 3:25 am
Posted on 8/22/16 at 3:25 am
1)Aranda's familiarity with Wisky players and offense or
2)Wisky staff and offensive players being very familiar with Aranda's system?
Such an interesting dynamic to this matchup and the fact it was scheduled years before Aranda ever thought of coming to LSU makes matchup even more unique.
2)Wisky staff and offensive players being very familiar with Aranda's system?
Such an interesting dynamic to this matchup and the fact it was scheduled years before Aranda ever thought of coming to LSU makes matchup even more unique.
This post was edited on 8/22/16 at 3:39 am
13
Posted on 8/22/16 at 3:27 am to lsudocts
I would think the advantage would go towards Aranda because he has better players to execute with.
Posted on 8/22/16 at 7:56 am to lsudocts
The advantage goes to whomever uses the leverage best. The leverage is equal.
Posted on 8/22/16 at 8:04 am to lsudocts
Aranda because he has better tools with which to work
Posted on 8/22/16 at 8:30 am to lsudocts
I'd say Aranda because he's smarter than everyone else.
Posted on 8/22/16 at 8:39 am to lsudocts
There's really no advantage on either side.
This post was edited on 8/22/16 at 8:40 am
Posted on 8/22/16 at 8:41 am to lsudocts
It'll be 50 degrees. Advantage: Wisky
Posted on 8/22/16 at 8:45 am to lsudocts
I would think the advantages you posted would be even, and talent will decide the game. 
Posted on 8/22/16 at 9:00 am to lsudocts
There is no advantage for either team. Had Aranda remained at Wisconsin and Steele at LSU both coaching staffs would have seen enough game film of the other team to know them inside and out and would have been preparing for those tendencies.
Aranda being at LSU means litlle in way of an advantage.
Aranda being at LSU means litlle in way of an advantage.
Posted on 8/22/16 at 9:24 am to lsudocts
(1) How much familiarity does Dave Aranda have with Paul Chryst's offense? One season. The previous two, Aranda spent with Gary Andersen and his transition in recruiting philosophy.
(2) How much familiarity does Paul Chryst have with Dave Aranda's 3-4 defense? One season. The previous three, while at Pittsburgh, Chryst ran a 4-3.
The advantage simply comes from the team that has more talent, which is undoubtedly LSU. That being said, Wisconsin is not short-on-talent, either. As I've stated multiple times, there are only four other programs with more Top-75 picks since 2011 than Wisconsin. The program does an outstanding job developing its players over the course of four- to five-years.
(2) How much familiarity does Paul Chryst have with Dave Aranda's 3-4 defense? One season. The previous three, while at Pittsburgh, Chryst ran a 4-3.
The advantage simply comes from the team that has more talent, which is undoubtedly LSU. That being said, Wisconsin is not short-on-talent, either. As I've stated multiple times, there are only four other programs with more Top-75 picks since 2011 than Wisconsin. The program does an outstanding job developing its players over the course of four- to five-years.
Posted on 8/22/16 at 11:31 am to lsudocts
quote:
1)Aranda's familiarity with Wisky players and offense or
Posted on 8/22/16 at 3:07 pm to lsudocts
Our advantage benefits our defense while theirs benefits their offense.
I'll take defense over offense especially early in the season.
Clear advantage LSU
I'll take defense over offense especially early in the season.
Clear advantage LSU
Posted on 8/22/16 at 3:09 pm to lsudocts
quote:
1)Aranda's familiarity with Wisky players and offense or
2)Wisky staff and offensive players being very familiar with Aranda's system?
Such an interesting dynamic to this matchup and the fact it was scheduled years before Aranda ever thought of coming to LSU makes matchup even more unique.
Aranda has stated he changes his system to fit the players. I am not sure he'll throw out the same exact stuff he had at Wisconsin with less physically gifted guys and less depth. I bet there are some new looks he's never implemented before as he's never had this much talent/speed/size/depth.
However their offensive scheme will be much of the same I'm sure. Its not like its complicated though. Wisconsin frickin' runs the ball and then runs the ball some more and throws to the TEs.
They are similar to LSU in that their offense is no mystery. They dare you to lineup and stop them from running it down your throat.
This post was edited on 8/22/16 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 8/22/16 at 3:45 pm to lsudocts
OCs don't spend time analyzing their own team's defense. Same for DCs.
They worry about their own players and their opponents. Aranda never had to game plan for playing Wisconsin's offense.
So I think it's no material advantage to either team that Aranda came from Wisconsin.
They worry about their own players and their opponents. Aranda never had to game plan for playing Wisconsin's offense.
So I think it's no material advantage to either team that Aranda came from Wisconsin.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News