- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How would Babe Ruth fare in the steroid era?
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:56 am to Adam Banks
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:56 am to Adam Banks
quote:
Plus baseball is so much hand eye coordination which is purely natural skill that would translate regardless of era
I'm not a baseball guy in any way, so this might be a dumb question but it's purely out of ignorance, because i honestly don't know.
What kind of speeds were pitchers back in teh 20s getting up to?
Posted on 8/16/16 at 11:08 am to WG_Dawg
quote:They were never able to really measure it. From what I've looked up since this thread started, there are measurements for Walter Johnson(faster pitcher of those days) at around 91 and also 99 with 2 different systems, but who really knows.
I'm not a baseball guy in any way, so this might be a dumb question but it's purely out of ignorance, because i honestly don't know. What kind of speeds were pitchers back in teh 20s getting up to?
I do think we can just use a little logic to point out that over the past 100 years in virtually every aspect of every sport, we've gotten better. So the idea of throwing 99 almost 100 years ago just didn't seem plausible. Throw in they pitched entire games and on 3 day's rest, it's way more likely that day in and day out they were seeing much slower pitching, by a lot I'd think.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)