Started By
Message

re: How would Babe Ruth fare in the steroid era?

Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:56 am to
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86624 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Plus baseball is so much hand eye coordination which is purely natural skill that would translate regardless of era


I'm not a baseball guy in any way, so this might be a dumb question but it's purely out of ignorance, because i honestly don't know.

What kind of speeds were pitchers back in teh 20s getting up to?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111305 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 11:08 am to
quote:

I'm not a baseball guy in any way, so this might be a dumb question but it's purely out of ignorance, because i honestly don't know. What kind of speeds were pitchers back in teh 20s getting up to?
They were never able to really measure it. From what I've looked up since this thread started, there are measurements for Walter Johnson(faster pitcher of those days) at around 91 and also 99 with 2 different systems, but who really knows.

I do think we can just use a little logic to point out that over the past 100 years in virtually every aspect of every sport, we've gotten better. So the idea of throwing 99 almost 100 years ago just didn't seem plausible. Throw in they pitched entire games and on 3 day's rest, it's way more likely that day in and day out they were seeing much slower pitching, by a lot I'd think.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram