Started By
Message

re: Has Rotten Tomatoes jumped the shark?...

Posted on 7/16/16 at 9:57 am to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 7/16/16 at 9:57 am to
quote:

And is Ghostbusters the movie to do it?
Well most critics select the fresh or gotten rating themselves. So the rating is only as good as the critics themselves.


From the FAQ:
quote:

Most critics from the Online Film Critics Society (OFCS) enter their own quotes and ratings. For critics who don't enter in their own quotes and ratings, it's basically up to the judgment of the editors. They take into account word choice, rating (if any), tone, and who the critic is in their determination of whether a review is positive or not.

If an editor is not certain about a review, it is sent to another editor for a second opinion. "Wishy-washy" reviews or reviews where it's difficult to determine if the critic recommends the film are usually given a Rotten rating. We figure if the critic is not confident enough to give the movie even an implied recommendation, then we shouldn't either.
This post was edited on 7/16/16 at 10:16 am
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35633 posts
Posted on 7/16/16 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Well most critics select the fresh or gotten rating themselves. So the rating is only as good as the critics themselves.
This.

It's not the website. If you have a problem with RT ratings, you have a problem with critics in general. Don't shoot the messenger.
This post was edited on 7/16/16 at 6:59 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram