Started By
Message

re: If an "assault weapons ban" goes back into play

Posted on 7/5/16 at 12:37 pm to
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16697 posts
Posted on 7/5/16 at 12:37 pm to
It was held up 8-0 post Scalia in Caetano v Massachusetts. No new justice will change that.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 7/5/16 at 12:53 pm to
Not familiar with 90s ban. I have an extra stripped lower to do a build later. Will parts still be available?
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

It was held up 8-0 post Scalia in Caetano v Massachusetts. No new justice will change that.
I'm not a lawyer (and never wanted to be one). But maybe a constitutional scholar can chime in.

I though the Caetano decision dealt solely with stun guns.



I thought the Heller decision (which came on a 5-4 vote) upheld the right of private citizens to own firearms for traditionally lawful purposes, unconnected with service in a militia (such as self-defense in one's home).

I fail to see how the Heller decision won't change as soon as Hillary gets to appoint a SCOTUS justice.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram