- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2016 Clayton Kershaw: 145 Ks, 9 BBs
Posted on 5/12/16 at 11:52 pm to WestCoastAg
Posted on 5/12/16 at 11:52 pm to WestCoastAg
I never thought I'd see more pitching dominance in this era than Pedro from 1997 to 2003 or so, but Kershaw from 2011 until now is doing just that. His 2014 season isn't believable on paper, it simply looks fake.
Posted on 5/13/16 at 7:52 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
I never thought I'd see more pitching dominance in this era than Pedro from 1997 to 2003 or so, but Kershaw from 2011 until now is doing just that. His 2014 season isn't believable on paper, it simply looks fake.
Pedro's combined '99-00 seasons- (60 games started)ERA- 1.90
ERA+- 265
W-L- 41-10
WHIP- 0.830
K/9- 12.5
K/BB- 8.65
K- 298 (avg)
BB- 34 (avg)
Kershaw '14 season- (27 games)
ERA- 1.77
ERA+- 197
W-L- 21-3
WHIP- 0.857
K/9- 10.8
K/BB- 7.71
K- 239
BB- 31
Pretty damn close, but he's not quite Pedro level (on a pure dominance scale). No one is. Then you have to also factor in that Pedro pitched right through the heart of the steroid era. Kershaw is great, but not quite GOAT like Pedro at his peak.
Posted on 6/5/16 at 3:48 am to Roger Klarvin
Pedro also pitched in the heart of the PED era. The guys he was having to pitch against were all roided out which makes what he did that much more impressive.
Posted on 6/5/16 at 3:48 am to Roger Klarvin
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/5/16 at 3:49 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)