Started By
Message

re: Fourth Pregnant Zika in the US confirmed: New York City

Posted on 1/29/16 at 1:16 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96271 posts
Posted on 1/29/16 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Which would probably be more than expected on average, but exponentially more like the fear-mongering would lead us to believe. If we use US and it's vastly superior medicine and diagnostic tools as a baseline, there are 12 per 10,000 born with microcephaly.

Using that rate rate and Brazil's birth rate, we would expect about 3600 born with Microcephaly per year or 1200 in 4 months. So 1500 isn't that far outside the expectation.

12/10,000 is what is diagnosed AT BIRTH. 25,000 are diagnosed a year in the US because at birth the doctor might not notice
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96271 posts
Posted on 1/29/16 at 1:17 pm to
I have a feeling in Brazil the baby is born, sent home, and that is that.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35250 posts
Posted on 1/29/16 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

10,000 is what is diagnosed AT BIRTH. 25,000 are diagnosed a year in the US because at birth the doctor might not notice
Yeah but I'm assuming these Brazilian cases are more likely to be birth cases. And I'm using more conservative estimates given the Zika virus is a relatively new phenomenon. Therefore, 1200 would be a lower bound of expectation, and you may be right, a higher number may be more realistic.

BUT even using that lower bound, the evidence is not near as alarming as the fear-mongering would suggest.
This post was edited on 1/29/16 at 1:37 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram