- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gating canals in houma area
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:10 pm to Dock Holiday
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:10 pm to Dock Holiday
quote:
I'll sort of help him some, but I'll leave you guys to figure out where I copied the below from.
The court notes that connecting waterways made navigable through erosion are "naturally" navigable, and thus ordinarily subject to a navigational servitude, even if the erosion was caused by increased water flow from the privately dredged canal
Dardar v. Lafourche Realty Co.
I don't know if it's relevant or what it means but here is the link.
2
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:16 pm to Barf
Bingo.
Relavancy will be a matter of opionion, but it's an interesting statement in the case that many feel is the jurisprudence for this topic.
Relavancy will be a matter of opionion, but it's an interesting statement in the case that many feel is the jurisprudence for this topic.
Posted on 1/28/16 at 1:38 pm to Barf
The context is a federal servitude.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News