Started By
Message

re: Some of you pervs are screwed...

Posted on 1/21/16 at 5:14 pm to
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63494 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 5:14 pm to
Wouldn't it be similar to any other warrant? They would get approval to extract only the data needed to identify the owner based on specific actions taken in the site?

I offer this not to argue, but as a legit question for discussion. I'm out of my depth on warrants.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80523 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Michaud is arguing that his charges be dismissed on grounds that the government’s use of the tool violated the Fourth Amendment. Fieman argues that some people might have gone to the site seeking to express fantasies, which while repugnant, are legal. The site, he said, doesn’t clearly advertise itself as devoted to child pornogaphy.

He likened the government’s warrant to a “general warrant,” referring to the British practice during the colonial era of allowing government searches without any individualized suspicion.

The judge in Michaud’s case is scheduled on Friday to hear several motions that could result in the dismissal of charges against him.

“This is a gray area in the law,” said Thomas Brown, a former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York who handled cases involving the use of hacking techniques. “It’s another instance where you’ve got technology outstripping the law.”

Fieman also said that rules established by the federal courts, grounded in constitutional principles, require that a warrant be deployed in the district in which it is issued — in this case, the Eastern District of Virginia. Michaud’s computer was in Vancouver.


LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram