- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Making A Murder O-T Lounge Thread
Posted on 1/4/16 at 12:57 am to AlbertMeansWell
Posted on 1/4/16 at 12:57 am to AlbertMeansWell
quote:
Sure law enforcement went about it the wrong way but the right verdict was reached.
No, the burden of proof is on the prosecution. All of the evidence they provided has been proven to be tainted in one form or another. You are viewing the verdict subjectively; one of the cornerstones of our criminal justice system is the state having to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the person convicted of the crime is indeed guilty. If you don't see reasonable doubt in any of those two cases you are a complete buffoon.
Did OJ kill his wife? He's admitted as much. But did the State prove he was guilty? Hell no. The evidence proving he was guilty was as much a shite show as this case. OJ deserved to walk, so does this man. And FYI, I do believe Avery killed the woman. But the testimony of his cousin was beyond coerced to the point of comedy (if the situation wasn't serious). That was the chief piece of evidence in the conviction of Avery.
This post was edited on 1/4/16 at 1:01 am
4
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:07 am to bountyhunter
quote:
OJ deserved to walk, so does this man. And FYI, I do believe Avery killed the woman
You've got some serious jacked arse views of how the world should work.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 8:42 am to bountyhunter
quote:
5. Pornography was recovered in Avery's residence
The Wisconsin State Journal reported on Nov. 12, 2005 that officers recovered "pornographic material, according to the search warrants."
Oh shite, I think I'm a murderer.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 9:45 am to bountyhunter
quote:
Did OJ kill his wife? He's admitted as much. But did the State prove he was guilty? Hell no.
oh bullshite - the state proved the case beyond any shred of doubt.
OJ was acquitted because he was black - not because there was anything wrong with the evidence.
The only thing wrong with the prosecution was that they presented too much evidence of guilt.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:29 pm to bountyhunter
quote:Fwiw, there were 12 jurors with access to wayyyyyyyy more information than we have, and all 12 eventually arrived at a guilty verdict.
No, the burden of proof is on the prosecution. All of the evidence they provided has been proven to be tainted in one form or another. You are viewing the verdict subjectively; one of the cornerstones of our criminal justice system is the state having to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the person convicted of the crime is indeed guilty. If you don't see reasonable doubt in any of those two cases you are a complete buffoon.
quote:
But the testimony of his cousin was beyond coerced to the point of comedy (if the situation wasn't serious). That was the chief piece of evidence in the conviction of Avery.
Was this evidence actually used at the trial?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News