- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU vs. Alabama in the QB department, Nick Saban holds the key!
Posted on 12/1/15 at 7:33 am to reauxl tigers7
Posted on 12/1/15 at 7:33 am to reauxl tigers7
quote:I've been posting a variation of these graphs for over a year.
Maybe we're over thinking this QB development/recruiting thing. When LSU has veteran guys under center these are the results:
![](https://i66.tinypic.com/2hfkqyc.jpg)
These graphs clearly show that as LSU QBs get more years in the system, their production tends to increase.
QB production is not static. Only morons use the talking point of whether QBs have "it" or not. There are just far too many examples of QBs who suck as freshmen and sophomores but who blossom as juniors and seniors.
Only morons point to outlier freshman or sophomore QB stars at other schools and think that should be the norm for LSU. Consistently high production from a freshman or sophomore QB is NOT the norm.
QBs tend to get better as they spend more years in college.
Many fans scream about the type of QB should be recruiting. They point to the success of Mauck, Flynn, and Mettenberger and say that LSU should recruit "pro style" QBs. Putting to the side whether Mauck or Flynn were even "pro style" QBs or whether Miles even focuses on recruiting "dual threat" QBs, what there same people fail to consider is that Mauck, Flynn, and Mettenberger did not start as freshmen or sophomores. If Mauck, Flynn, or Mettenberger had started as freshmen or sophomores, they probably would have looked like crap for several games during the year.
Some people say that Harris does not have "it." That's bullshite on many levels. First, it's bullshite that Harris should be written off for not having "it." Second, it's bullshite to think that QBs either have "it" or they don't have "it." QBs can, and usually do, improve year over year.
Harris showed marked improvement during the first seven games in 2015. (Damn shame he missed the McNeese game.) He got injured in the Alabama game and regressed. There is no rational reason to think Harris won't be much improved next year.
Posted on 12/1/15 at 7:46 am to Salviati
According to Salviati's charts, BH and Mett had almost identical numbers their first years starting. This gives me hope.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)