Started By
Message

re: Watched "Foxcatcher" last night.

Posted on 10/21/15 at 11:53 am to
Posted by scoot25
LA--CO
Member since Nov 2008
865 posts
Posted on 10/21/15 at 11:53 am to
quote:

If you watch the ESPN 30 on 30 about the incident it's much better and not boring at all.

This. 30 for 30 is 100% better than the movie. I think Ruffalo, Tatum, & Carrel did a good job in the movie but the pacing and story was slow and boring. They honestly covered the exact same story, told in the same timeline, but in an hour rather than two. And told by the people who were there rather than actors. After watching the 30 for 30 it made me regret watching the movie.

quote:

Super boring movie and it skips like five years of maddness.

This is so damn true.

Posted by tirebiter
7K R&G chile land aka SF
Member since Oct 2006
9282 posts
Posted on 10/21/15 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

but in an hour rather than two. And told by the people who were there rather than actors. After watching the 30 for 30 it made me regret watching the movie.


+1, well worth the time.
Posted by DirklasDaDirk
St. Martin Parish
Member since Dec 2010
1498 posts
Posted on 10/21/15 at 12:42 pm to
It didn't break my heart as much as the Man on the Moon pretty much completely missing the point on Andy Kaufman but I agree; I knew too much of the story before hand being a nerd that follows MMA & Kurt Angle and was way overhyped but it was kind of boring esp. compared to the pace of Moneyball.. also, Mark Ruffalo is easily the best actor in that movie; his channeling of Dave was beautifully done.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram