Started By
Message

re: The Cubs deserve to lose badly

Posted on 10/15/15 at 2:23 pm to
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
15968 posts
Posted on 10/15/15 at 2:23 pm to
I could be wrong, but I think Tideroller's point was that the Cubs didn't have a uniquely loyal fanbase prior to '84. Their attendance figures were far below the league average for years.

Every winning team gets bandwagoners, but Tribune Co. was able to use their national network to market an otherwise ordinary ballclub and their rundown ballpark in an era when no one else could. It was a genius way to build the support they have today.
Posted by LSU_Cubs
NW Burbs
Member since Jul 2012
372 posts
Posted on 10/15/15 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

I could be wrong, but I think Tideroller's point was that the Cubs didn't have a uniquely loyal fanbase prior to '84.


I don't know about that. The '69 Cubs still have a huge following...I mean Billy Williams, Ron Santo, Ferguson Jenkins, Ernie Banks....

But anyways, even if we just go to '84, that's still 31 years ago. That's some old arse bandwagon fans
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
31448 posts
Posted on 10/15/15 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

I could be wrong, but I think Tideroller's point was that the Cubs didn't have a uniquely loyal fanbase prior to '84. Their attendance figures were far below the league average for years.



In the 1940s the cubs had an above average following.

Starting in the 1960s, they've pretty much been average or above the NL average every year.

LINK

So I would argue it goes back well before 1984.
This post was edited on 10/15/15 at 4:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram