Started By
Message

re: Reports of multiple fatalities at an Oregon Community College

Posted on 10/2/15 at 3:37 pm to
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36266 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Do you tell the truth when you take job application personality tests? Have you ever lied? Have you ever been sad one day, and then happy the next? Who gets to decide who is too crazy to own a firearm, and what level will they set that at?


Most of these people have a history of mental illness. Like I said it wouldn't stop every incident, but it would empower people to do something about some of them beforehand. As far as who decides I would consider doctors would be the ones to decide the levels and do the evaluations.
Posted by Mizzoufan26
Vacaville CA
Member since Sep 2012
17349 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Most of these people have a history of mental illness. Like I said it wouldn't stop every incident, but it would empower people to do something about some of them beforehand. As far as who decides I would consider doctors would be the ones to decide the levels and do the evaluations.


Ever seen a trial of anyone.

Ever notice how they always have medical experts that directly contradict one another.

So again, how is it that one person finds the colorado theater shooter crazy, one not, and then which of those 2 decides
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43030 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 3:52 pm to
Doctors will say anything you want them to if you pay them. Their political leanings will also cloud their judgement and severely skew their personal decisions one way or another.

Also, what LEVEL of mental illness is enough to strip someone of their constitutional rights? See, it's pretty undefinable


Again, the only logical thing to do would be to try and set up more available mental health counseling. It is the only thing that people on both sides would agree on. The only people that wouldn't like it are people that don't want more taxes. You've just got to explain to them how it could benefit them personally and their city/state/country. I know the government will completely botch it because politics and money are involved, but that is the best, quickest, plausible solution IMHO

That is the best, quickest, plausible solution if we had a functioning government that wasn't chocked full of functional retards being puppeted by special interest groups, donors, and organizations
This post was edited on 10/2/15 at 3:59 pm
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56635 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

As far as who decides I would consider doctors would be the ones to decide the levels and do the evaluations.
That's one hell of a Pandora's box. They set the level, most likely arbitrarily, and then lower the bar every time someone goes on a shooting despite the evaluation. And as another poster said, I know people who fit all of the aforementioned "traits," and none of them have shot anyone.

Remember, one side of the aisle wants a total gun ban. I'm not giving these clowns power over my constitutional rights.
Posted by RJYH
Member since Aug 2010
6923 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 5:15 pm to
Did this guy ever show signs of mental illness?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram