Started By
Message

re: Worse talent level in Payton era

Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:35 pm to
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

Again, we both know what average is.



No, we don't. I know what a statistical average is, but you seem to miss it

quote:

There are probably 50 WRs in the league who would perform at the level he performs at in this offense.


32 teams in the NFL. So if he's #51, he would still be above average as an NFL wide receiver

quote:

Nevertheless, this team overall is undertalented, IMO. That's my opinion.



Cool, just study up on the definition of average
This post was edited on 9/2/15 at 10:36 pm
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56955 posts
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

No, we don't. I know what a statistical average is, but you seem to miss it



Average NFL starter dude. This conversation is about what our overall talent looks like. You make no point when you say that our starting WR is above average relative to the entire population of WRs in the league. That certainly wasn't the point I was trying to make and only an idiot would have thought that.

quote:

32 teams in the NFL. So if he's #51, he would still be above average as an NFL wide receiver



How does it make any sense to think that i'm not talking about starters when trying to evaluate the talent level? Colston is a starter. He's not an above average starter.

quote:


Cool, just study up on the definition of average



Congrats. You've successfully played the semantics game and in the process lost total site of the conversation at hand.
This post was edited on 9/2/15 at 10:55 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram