- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Reasons to veto a trade (All discussion here)
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:12 am
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:12 am
There are already too many of these popping up. So get them all here in one thread. I will post below the reasons to veto a trade.
1. Is the trade collusion? If yes... veto, if no dont try and manage other owners teams for them.
2. There are no other reasons to veto a trade.
1. Is the trade collusion? If yes... veto, if no dont try and manage other owners teams for them.
2. There are no other reasons to veto a trade.
6
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:15 am to oleyeller
quote:
. Is the trade collusion? If yes... veto, if no dont try and manage other owners teams for them.
this one
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:45 am to oleyeller
Yeah, but what if it will give a team too many good players, and I have to play them later? Who needs 3 top 10 WRs? That's not fair.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:49 am to oleyeller
How do you determine collusion?
Oh yea, you can't.
Oh yea, you can't.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:54 am to oleyeller
The issue is when and how you determine collusion. This isn't a definite thing. You can only go off of suggestions and evidence. Is the trade so lopsided to where it doesn't make sense? What is the relationship between the partners? Where in the season are we, and is it possible for both teams to make the playoffs? Etc. There are various factors to consider, and none of them are definite besides an actual admission.
In theory, yes, collusion is the only reason to veto. In practice things are more difficult to figure out.
In theory, yes, collusion is the only reason to veto. In practice things are more difficult to figure out.
This post was edited on 9/2/15 at 10:58 am
Posted on 9/2/15 at 11:12 am to oleyeller
Last year the guy in last place after week 9 I think just started offering all his good players to people for their bench guys. I'm talking like D Thomas for Olsen(other guy had Gronk), AJ Green for Reggie Bush, etc. I was pissed and sent the commish a message and never heard anything back and he let all the trades go through. Oh and he was the one who got D Thomas. It was complete bullshite, but I still beat his arse in the playoffs and won the league.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 12:50 pm to oleyeller
The whole "just kick them out next year" line of thought is just dumb. You risk losing good owners because they got fricked out of money by a completely lopsided, indefensible trade.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News