- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Today's Advocate headline, "I-10 widening garners little enthusiasm"
Posted on 8/31/15 at 10:43 am to TDsngumbo
Posted on 8/31/15 at 10:43 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
Regardless of how many lanes are added, the bridge is still what it is. All adding extra lanes would do is move the bottlenecks.
The frick? Adding lanes where the bottleneck is gets rid of the bottleneck.
1
Posted on 8/31/15 at 10:46 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
The frick? Adding lanes where the bottleneck is gets rid of the bottleneck.
So if 3 lanes merge into 2 at the bridge, how will making it 4 lanes merging into 2 better?
The "bottleneck" is the bridge and widening the area before the bridge still leaves the "bottleneck" with a fatter "bottle" leading into it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News