- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is your biggest critique of our society?
Posted on 7/31/15 at 1:58 am to sabes que
Posted on 7/31/15 at 1:58 am to sabes que
My biggest critique of modern society is the quickness of those with good intentions to run to the government first and not last. Instead of being the tool of last resort that is rightly feared for the means with which it accomplishes its ends, most people in our society who are in a position where they "solve problems" (economists, social workers, sociologists, planners, even charity workers) unhesitatingly believe that the government must be involved from the start.
Instead of seeking to bring others to our cause, instead of seeking to raise funds through voluntary interaction, and instead of seeking to solve perceived injustices by trying to convert others to goodness (for example, convincing cake owners that it is wrong to deny service to certain people), we as a people are increasingly using the barrel of a gun to do the dirty work instead of actually working to bring others together to solve problems willingly and with free will, which is the far more moral way of going about doing things.
The way we as a society are beginning to view government is incredibly frightening. It's an incredibly important tool indeed, but its power is a double-edged sword. Unfortunately, I believe there is a sentiment growing that government is best when it is actively involved in planning, directing, and regulating our society. How different that is from the traditional view that most prudent and safe conception of government is that of a guard and a defender that only springs to life when an external force (an army, a thief, etc) has been applied to it.
Instead of seeking to bring others to our cause, instead of seeking to raise funds through voluntary interaction, and instead of seeking to solve perceived injustices by trying to convert others to goodness (for example, convincing cake owners that it is wrong to deny service to certain people), we as a people are increasingly using the barrel of a gun to do the dirty work instead of actually working to bring others together to solve problems willingly and with free will, which is the far more moral way of going about doing things.
The way we as a society are beginning to view government is incredibly frightening. It's an incredibly important tool indeed, but its power is a double-edged sword. Unfortunately, I believe there is a sentiment growing that government is best when it is actively involved in planning, directing, and regulating our society. How different that is from the traditional view that most prudent and safe conception of government is that of a guard and a defender that only springs to life when an external force (an army, a thief, etc) has been applied to it.
This post was edited on 7/31/15 at 2:03 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News