- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If the Wage Gap Exists, Why Do Companies Hire Men?
Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:46 am to shel311
Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:46 am to shel311
quote:
So people have gone through data, put in tons of research and made conclusions, and you disagree with it...just because?
it's not "just because".. that "77 cent" number is derived from all income iirc
women who are unmarried and have never had children often make more than male counterparts in the same field
child birth is the primary variable that affects women's careers, which is what affects their long term earning (and potential). every child birth takes a few months of less productivity (end of the pregnancy) and then a few months of maternity leave. risking the hire on a candidate who plans to get pregnant is also a major risk. add those 2 factors and women are less appealing for managerial roles and why they don't progress as often.
there are 2 other factors that skew the aggregate numbers
1. the super rich. this group tilts heavily towards males. these are mostly entrepreneurial endeavors so sex has no influence on anything
2. career choice. the division of jobs is not equal. remember, there are more women in college and MANY more graduating from college these days. but more men graduate from the higher paying jobs. no matter how hard SJWs try, women just aren't as interested in engineering, programming, etc jobs. also, non-college careers aren't equal. men do a MUCH higher % of dangerous/risky jobs and due to the nature of the jobs, they get paid more.
Posted on 7/31/15 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
Jake, you're have a slightly higher level of intelligence than the typical poster.
Single man, no kids, college degree vs. single woman, no kids, same degree is more of an apple to apple comparison.
Single mother of 3 kids in same household vs single father of 3 (kids live w/mother) isn't comparing the same two types of apples.
In the 70's and 80's when 2 family incomes became the norm was the start of the latch key generation.
I can't prove it, but suspect much of the U.S.'s current social problems can be traced back to that time.
Single man, no kids, college degree vs. single woman, no kids, same degree is more of an apple to apple comparison.
Single mother of 3 kids in same household vs single father of 3 (kids live w/mother) isn't comparing the same two types of apples.
In the 70's and 80's when 2 family incomes became the norm was the start of the latch key generation.
I can't prove it, but suspect much of the U.S.'s current social problems can be traced back to that time.
Posted on 7/31/15 at 9:04 am to SlowFlowPro
When controlled for education, profession, hours worked, etc... the wage gap shrinks to roughly 4-5% depending on the study and research. There are always going to be outliers and individual cases of discrimination but to say the wage gap is a major issue is dishonest.
I'm confident that whoever the democratic nominee is will make this a part of their platform and will trump the .77 statistic because people will take it at face value, which is another reason to hate politicians.
I'm confident that whoever the democratic nominee is will make this a part of their platform and will trump the .77 statistic because people will take it at face value, which is another reason to hate politicians.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News