Started By
Message

re: Is the US Womens "dominance" only because the WC hasn't been around long?

Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:07 pm to
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20926 posts
Posted on 7/1/15 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

Is the US Womens "dominance" only because the WC hasn't been around long?



quote:

I was young in 91 when the WC started. The women won. Norway won, then the US won again. Were those 2 wins in basically a 10 year span because the world just wasn't preparing/ready for a WC on the women's side?

Germany came through and did pretty well after it was established that there would be a continuous women's world cup.

Japan now looks like they will be contenders after a few WCs.

So, did we just luck out having stellar athletes and catching the other countries that have not had years to prepare?




Let's be honest. It's largely about money, and how much your country is willing to spend on womens' sports.

Obviously it will get harder, but the competition will be pretty limited for a while (at least in comparison to the men).
This post was edited on 7/1/15 at 9:33 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram